For full text search please use the '?' prefix. e.g. ? Onboarding

Why are proof assistants so unfriendly?

Inspired by Katherine Ye's Proof assistants as a tool for thought.

Some logic can be a game: see The Incredible Proof Machine:

Goal-directed games obviously aren't always great though.

Counter: proof assistants are about clear thinking. Many prefer paper and pencil still.

Links

  • Proofscape
  • Holbert Theorem Prover
  • Proof Tree Builder - Joomy seems to be working at the SOTA here.
  • https://twitter.com/TaliaRinger/status/1373076827879604224?s=19

The Transparent Prolog Machine

https://twitter.com/kamatsu8/status/1449178161665777666?s=21

https://twitter.com/totbwf/status/1450605827119673344?s=21

What if you could sonify proofs?

Focused theorem plays some loop based on the tree.

Counter thread

https://twitter.com/cattheory/status/1470762265288785921?s=21

https://twitter.com/sarah_zrf/status/1470788248695881733?s=21

So, how can a proof assistant aid thought, not just proof tree walking?

https://www.irit.fr/~Martin.Strecker/Publications/ticttl_panda2011.pdf

https://mobile.twitter.com/disconcision/status/1491571996718628866


Backlinks
  • Organic Chemistry if it was Fun
  • Domain-Learning with Computational Microworlds
Links
What if you could sonify proofs?
Counter thread